How Happy could Gay Men be in a Homophobic Society such as Ours Essay

homoeroticism is no longer an undisclosed humor amongst us, and their existence in our party is no longer a gesture to be raised. As we know, they enter the like shops we visit invariablyy now and then they cod the same buses and sub styles we catch they walk the same streets we tread everyday they breathe the same air we do, all for sensation sp ar reason they are no little human than any of us in this nine could possibly be.Despite the third estate knowledge we all substantiate work onive the existence of these flock who suddenly came come on from the box, it still raises polar reactions from the crowd of the so called normal passelas the decree itself may refer to it. While others have learned to pack the given detail that there is a possibility of transition to the socially stigmatise standard of normality, much(prenominal) as this one on the celestial sphere of gender, there are still some(prenominal) who just couldnt practice the act of coexistence with these so called new breeds. There are still hatful who religiously suppose that the defiance of the norm such as crossing from one gender to some other is absolutely unaccept adequate. Given this ingenuousness, a good deal of causes have been do to somehow careen these heap out of their enclosed bubbles. horizontal media, one of the virtually influential elework forcets in our society, took a step further by recognizing the existence of intrepids and lesbians in their projects themed after different slices of feellike the top notching series bequeath & Grace, and the award-winning movie Philadelphia.With pots warm embrace with the fancy in moving pictures, it seemed no further from the possibility that they could, one way or another, welcome the fancy in reality with open arms the exclusively question re principal(prenominal)ing is how wide open could these people ex melt their arms based on what their televisions feed them? According to Marisa Conolly on her oblige entitled Homosexuality on television The Heterosexualization of testa ment & Grace in put out Media, despite the television show Will & Graces attempt to conjure up the normality of the existence of comic workforce in the society, the show wasnt able to fully liberate the misunderstood bunch. measuredly or not, certain limitations have been set by the said show, leaving surplus provisions among viewing audience which they could refer to in terms of classifying quirk un pleasing and acceptable for the publics eyes. Generally, Will, one of the main characters of the said show who happens to play a part of a supposed homosexual, was somehow portrayed in a straight off person manner his mere association with Grace, a straight female character, shades the chance to a different color.Their supposed familiarity was brought into a different heterosexual tolerance of descent, wherein platonic is brought into a twisted romanticist anglesomehow portraying him caught in in the midst of the certainty of homosexuality and the movement to lean on directness. Unfortunately, their possible invade to sell is totally negating the promotion of the other, and so making it more complicated for the viewers whether to absorb him as a astute gay who solely assays identification, or as a male, in the middle of an identity operator crisis, still clinging on the intellectionlism of heterosexuality through tricky dramatization of his relationship with a straight woman.The same idea was raised in the film Philadelphia by Jonathan Demme. On the said movie, instead deliberation through the inconsistency of the perceived government agency of character, the viewers are obviously organism caught in the middle of a life and closing situation. Instead of making their viewers understand the real score deep d bear the extent of reality that the film itself is providing, they are subconsciously redefining pity as a substitute for this understanding. They h ave misused the approaching of death to the gay personas advantage by playing on it as if saying Hey, I am dying now of AIDS, and I am gay.Now that I go by be leaving this mortal place soon, will you please have the compassion of accept me for who I really am? Personally, I dont think that this is the halal way of educating the people because it is basically mis endureing. though the two groups are closely create from raw material by its constant reception of secrecy from the society, it is unfair to define creation gay no different from having AIDS. Being gay is not a deadly viral disease like AIDS it is simply a way of life that is, more often than not, being misunderstood.Upon watching the film, I was left caught at the vagueness of Denzel Washingtons character. I imagination at starting that he will be the one responsible to set free tom Hanks character, but by the end of the film, my hopes were dropped on the floor. His supposed homophobia, which I first thought will be the vital agent he has as one of the lead character, somehow got lost in the last mentioned part of the invoice. The issue tackled dealt mainly on Hanks viral illness and how most people generally react to itgiving the homosexuality issue, which is more widespread in reality, a weak standpoint.The common ground between the two different portrayals of gay men stated above is its tendency to seek for conditions before rattling opening the idea of acceptance. For television sitcom Will & Grace, they want for a subtle way to adapt with the norms by partially heterosexualizing the gay character, eyepatch for the movie Philadelphia, they played with emotions, most specifically guilt, by bringing into their attention that death is an uneventful future for the character.Basically, in their own particular ways, they are always spirit for certain loop holes to pull pip quirk acceptablemeaning gayness itself defines no reason to stand on its own. In this case, their un vituperati ve viewers tend to get accustomed in aspect for such passages before they actually accept certain circumstances, which unfortunately not every gay man has. In the end, progeny of ideas and slices of life such as these single implies that as eon passed by the society is still keeping its doors closed to the credit rating of homosexualitys existence.Again it tho shows the greatest weakness that any society has a fear of the un unremarkable. They are not exactly liberation but instead a form of deception in order to switch the attention of the critical public regarding their claim for ample recognition to homosexuals. None of these moving images placed a dot at the end of the line of reasoning we accept homosexuality instead, they moreover made the issue more complex than ever by adding up the condition if and only if to the said declaration. If the shows themselves couldnt accept the incident that gay men exist, how could their viewers do?I could give credit for the attempt pull out gays and lesbians from their malicious-satirical stereotype of simply being unpleasant, loud and mischievous, but still, that doesnt make it enough for me. Compassion may be the scoop out way to seek approval, but seeking proofs out of the ordinary and passing it off as the best solution is nothing but a substandard achievement. Homosexuality isnt actually an issue seeking for a superfluous treatment that will be way too much for a address now that it couldnt even light upon the approval of being lined up on the average level.All gays and lesbians withdraw is the chance to be treated in a normal wayno more and no less than how people accept heterosexualswhere in they are not shoved away as if they are septic beasts. Since media started this crooked establishation of homosexuality on screen in the first place, I believe that they will be the only one who could correct this. Next time they produce best selling stories closely homosexuals on their reels, they should t ry taking away those special cases that tend to sensationalize their storieslike exploring Wills manly side as a gay man and Hanks incurable illness.If they want to represent gay men as part of the normal sphere of influence in our society, then they could probably represent them as plain as being another friendly neighbor from the square block without a semi-romantic relationship with a straight female, but rather a nonchalant relationship with another man, or a masteryful lawyer who need not die at the end of the story just to gain recognition for his success as a lawyer instead, he could just be another lawyer who saved the dayroles as simple as that, just like most heterosexuals portray.In that way, it will seem to be more realistic and fair for these people who usually live under the empennage of our judgmental society.